The oxford dictionary defines
‘lead’ as ‘to show (someone/something) the way to a destination by going in
front of or beside them’. The object/person who executes this action is termed
as a ‘Leader’. We must observe the vitality of going in front of or beside the
masses, as it distinguishes them from a self-proclaimed leader, who misses the
very nuance of leading. Every person has admirers who may position them to the
stature f a leader irrespective of his quality to actually take the baton and
walk in the front row or alongside others. We must not confuse ourselves
between popularity and leadership. A leader is always popular but reverse is
not always true.
When it comes to the origin of
leaders, different schools of thought point out different explanations. Some
opine that leaders are child prodigies while others say that leaders can be
manufactured. While no one trained Mahatma Gandhi to lead Indians on the path
of non-violence, Chanakya was supposed to play the pivotal role in shaping
Chandragupta Maurya’s career in being a commoner to a great ruler in ancient
India.
My concern is not about any of
the above said categories. I am more vexed about the third one, which claims
that leadership quality constitutes a major portion of their blood and flows
along with it and that their genes carry this quality to lead the other lesser
mortal souls who were not fortunate enough to have been born with a silver
spoon in their mouth. They still believe in the older version of monarchy in
which reins passed on to their heirs unless the quality became unbearable. But
the sad part is that this system is followed in democracy as well, with a
twisted game plan. This democratic monarchy is a monster which can gobble even
the most prosperous nation.
India is no different in suffering
dorm this pandemic. Move to any part of this country, which took away freedom
from an imperialistic British regime, you can come across the dynastic
politics being spread like water in the floods. Some of them may turn out to be
a good leader but the majority has simply put their Daddy’s shoes, whether it
fits them or not. My heart is coercing my fingers to type as many names as
possible but the mind suddenly commands my little finger to delete ‘names’.
They are not be blamed. We Indians have not yet come out of the dynastic rule
that has been ruling us for centuries and millenniums.
I will narrate a simple story
which shall relate to somebody but it will just be coincidental. There is this
man whose father died when he was young; he left him an enormous empire to
rule; he has been struggling to cope up; when the situation demands the most,
he goes for a hibernation leaving others to tackle. He is not batman but one of
a very influential person in India. Holding a post of second-in command of the
glorious and oldest political wing, he still thinks he can do whatever he
wishes to and no one will give a damn. The parliament session was round the
corner and he decided to go on a holiday. According to PRS India, a research
organization presents a dismal view of his performance in the parliament. While
the national average of attendance is 81%, he attended only 49%; when national
average on debate is 13.2, he held just one; while average question being asked
is 56, he asked none. There are many other accounts which clearly mention his
disenchantment from this job. Rightly so – he is Rahul Gandhi.
When most of your supporters are
looking for a spark in you which you have yet not been able to demonstrate, you
give away the chance to shine by shunning away from an important session. You
took a charge for UP election in 2012, and lost badly. The 2014 national
election was conducted to coronate you the prime-minister of India, but your
performance was so pathetic that your party achieved the worst failure till
date. Kudos! The way Mr. Gandhi alienated himself from the crucial budget
session by taking a self-announced break from god-knows-what important work and
went to God-knows-what place, it paints a picture of him stuck in a wrong job. Your
sycophants leave no stone unturned to put you on top of every success and take
the blame for all the failure, that it actually make you believe that you had
no role in Congress’s defeat and non but only you took the party to the zenith.
Mr. Gandhi, a very simple advice to
you. You are 44 years old and you can actually go after the career of your
choice and you can still make a respectable future. Politics is not you cup of
tea. The slight beard and folded sleeve neither makes you a macho, nor a
seasoned orator. Neither does the drama of having a glass of water in poor
man’s house make you a representative of a common man.
Enough of this drama. Okay, you really want to
make it big in politics; then start doing things right. Take commands in your
hand instead of running away. Mother won’t be there forever. Sycophants may
start pinching you slowly (slowly few words of resentment have already been
heard). In words of Ramadhir singh of GOW “Apne khetra me jao, karyakartao ko
motivation do”. Otherwise “Tumse na ho paega”
No comments:
Post a Comment