In countries which claim to have
stability in functioning, have various departments working in tandem and taking
good corrective measures, if one of the pillars falters. In India we have
independent legislative, executives and judiciary vested with their respective
power. These three pillars have always successfully been performing their duty
with one of these intervening in other’s affair when it feel that the decisions
are not taken in public’s interest. Even then there is a safety watch handed
over to a vigil team to protect the interest of common people. This is supposed
protector and act as a watchdog, is supposed to look after the mischief the
other three pillars. But what is this fourth invisible pillar goes berserk?
What if it just goes on to perform every task other than the prime objective?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a3aa/8a3aa495c7026ddee630113a31d559ff4853f36e" alt=""
So, when is the hero playing the
role of a villain? Or why is it doing so?
It has always performed its duty will be a prevarication from the truth.
Media is mainly a private sector industry in which it does all sort of things
to amass revenue. The biggest revenue source is advertisement and it receives
advertisements based on its TRP that is generates. To achieve higher TRPs it
tries to present news which is received by most of the masses. In order to do
that it sometimes sensationalizes the news. Many a times, an important but less
glamorous news is put on hold to give priority to less important but more
glamorous news.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4890c/4890cb48fb04436284207eea00a7efbfc6b2026e" alt=""
Another problem that I consider
is the sensationalizing the new. Just a couple of days back, Gen V.K. Singh sarcastically
commented that his visit to Pakistan High Commission the other day was more important
that visiting Yemen to save Indian expatriates. The statement was reported as
on a serious note by a very popular Indian news reader. My question is –
doesn’t he understand the difference between sarcasm and a factual statement.
Had V.K Singh not been serious about the rescue operation, he would not have
visited in person. I have no recollection about any of the previous ministers
going on a mission like that. Another question is – if you are given a mike and
a satellite power, it does not give you a right to take out your personal
vendetta against somebody. Mr, Aranab Goswami, a sincere request. If you are
good for nothing then it is more suited to glue your lips and never speak a
word which will more harm than good. You are nothing but trying to demoralize
the constructive work.
In my opinion, the media must
have a proper regulation, but without the involvement of the government. The
media house should revamp their strategy which churns out quality news and not
any action thriller movie. Your file photos or videos don’t even seem relent to
audio sometimes. Try to look within and compare yourselves with international
media houses like BBC, CNN, Al Jazira etc.
The time will not be far when you
will disenchant your viewers who in turn will stop believing your precarious
lies. It high time that I quote my marketing professor JK - “Sudahr jao warna
Udhar jao”.
No comments:
Post a Comment